Citing lack of public support, the California County that first considered using eminent domain to seize control of private residential mortgage-backed securities with the intent of cutting the principal balances of negative-equity borrowers has publicly announced its decision against that course of action.  Under the original proposal, Mortgage Resolution Partners would find institutional investors willing to provide the financing for government agencies to condemn millions of distressed mortgages.  The government would have taken title to the loans, but not the actual home, and paid the original mortgage owner the “fair value” with the money provided by institutional investors.  Mortgage Resolution Partners would then have worked to restructure the loans to reduce homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments, while selling the restructured loans to hedge funds, pension funds and other institutional investors with the proceeds paying back the outside financiers.

News of San Bernadino’s about-face comes hours after the concept was featured in discussion by eminent domain practitioners from around the country at the annual ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Conference in Miami last week.  At that conference, two panel discussions debated the wisdom of utilizing eminent domain to take underwater mortgages.  The panelists included Cornell Law Professor Robert Hockett, Loyola University Law Professor Emeritus Gideon Kanner, Pacific Legal Foundation’s James Burling and McKirdy & Riskin‘s Ed McKirdy and Anthony DellaPelle.   In sum, the panelists substantially agreed that the plan was fraught with possible problems and pitfalls, and warned that its implementation would be more expensive than the plan’s proponents had suggested, and was not likely to result in any meaningful public good or purpose.

The concept has been a lightning rod for public opinion.  As we noted in prior blog post found here, experts, media, and politicians varied widely in their opinions on the proposed plan.   However, this is may not be the last time we have heard of this idea as the company proposing the idea is still in discussions with other municipalities around the country to implement the plan.

For more on this story, please see the following news articles and opinion pieces:

San Bernadino County abandons eminent domain mortgage plan

San Bernardino County rejects ‘eminent domain for underwater mortgages’ proposal

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Eminent domain mortgage solution rejected

A solution for underwater mortgages: Eminent domain

RPT Investors tout controversial ‘condemnation’ for housing fix

Investors With Ties To Buffett, Soros, Obama Plan Mortgage Eminent Domain Grab

Eminent domain is floated for mortgages

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Controversial mortgage fix considered

County Studies Eminent Domain to Address Mortgage Crisis

 

Following a recent Texas Supreme Court decision that limited the ability of pipeline owners to condemn property under certain circumstances, a group of property owners in Texas lost their fight to keep a Canadian oil company, TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, from taking their property as part of a 4,000 mile pipeline project.  The landowners are fighting to keep TransCanada from immediately entering their properties and starting construction before lawyers and lawmakers have explored what the ruling means.

TransCanada argued that it has the right under an 1899 Texas statute to start construction without obtaining writs of possession through condemnation proceedings, but the company filed the appropriate paperwork and posted the required bonds instead to prevent a landowner from blocking access to the property.  However, the judge scheduled a hearing to consider whether TransCanada properly posted bonds for damage to properties if it ultimately loses the right to the land in later legal proceedings. Additionally, the judge will determine if Keystone must send out new legal notices to property owners not included in previous value-setting.

This firm first discussed this project over a year ago on Fox News Channel, where McKirdy & Riskin’s Anthony Della Pelle provided commentary – watch the video here.  Since that time, the project has received considerable attention in the media and has involved debate in political, legal and environmental forums.

For more on this story, please see the following blog posts and news articles:

Keystone Pipeline Project Chugging Along – New Jersey Condemnation Law

Pipeline Protests Reach the White House – New Jersey Condemnation Law

Can a foreign corporation use eminent domain on U.S. Land? – New Jersey Condemnation Law

Judge: Keystone can use eminent domain for pipelineAmarillo Globe-News

TransCanada Faces Texas Landowners in Court Over Pipeline – Bloomberg BusinessWeek

Landowner plans to appeal eminent-doman ruling on Keystone XL pipelineStar-Telegram

 

Today’s Daily Record featured this article by reporter Cara Townsend which highlighted Todd Kuehm, a fourth generation New Jersey farmer, and his fight against the Township of Montville’s use of eminent domain on his 28 acre farm.

Photo Courtesy of Cara Townsend/The Daily Record

The article covers the history of the litigation from the Township adopting ordinances which denied him the ability to install a well despite having permits from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, the entry and dismissal of several injunctions to deny him access to the well, to a recent finding by a New Jersey Superior Court judge that the Township had exceeded its authority and interfered with Mr. Kuehm’s property rights.  The Township later filed an appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division to challenge the court ruling.

Mr. Kuehm’s story was also recently the subject of Fox News Channel’s “It’s Your Land” series.   The video, featuring McKirdy and Riskin’s Anthony F. Della Pelle, may be viewed here.  Shortly after the TV segment, the Montville Patch also published its own story.

The matter is currently pending on appeal.

For more blog posts on property owners challenging a government’s use of eminent domain, please see the following:

Eminent Domain Abuse Sign is Protected Speech

Jury Awards Double NJ Transit’s Offer for Property Taken by Eminent Domain

Mt Holly Gardens Residents Live to Fight Another Day

Lotta Lettuce J.T.S. Farms, LLC is represented by McKirdy & Riskin, PA as the family’s condemnation counsel.

Best Lawyers, the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession, has named McKirdy & Riskin’s John H. Buonocore, Jr. as the “Newark Area Best Lawyers Eminent Domain and Condemnation Lawyer of the Year” for 2012. Best Lawyers is designating “Lawyers of the Year” in high-profile legal specialties in large legal communities. Only a single lawyer in each specialty in each community is being honored as the “Lawyer of the Year.”

Best Lawyers compiles its lists of outstanding attorneys by conducting exhaustive peer-review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. The current edition of The Best Lawyers in America (2012) is based on more than 3.1 million detailed evaluations of lawyers by other lawyers. The lawyers being honored as “Lawyers of the Year” have received particularly high ratings in our surveys by earning a high level of respect among their peers for their abilities, professionalism, and integrity.

To read more about Mr. Buonocore’s selection as the Eminent Domain Lawyer of the Year, check out this article from NewJerseyHills.com

The families who owned the Mother’s Park and Ridelot in Wayne, New Jersey were awarded $2.6 million in just compensation by  Passaic County jury last week for the taking of their property through eminent domain by NJ Transit.

Courtesy of bing.com

The property was originally acquired by DJ Properties to be converted to a restaurant, but the owner instead leased the property to the New Jersey Department of Transportation in 2002 for the park and ride use.  In a trial in Paterson where New Jersey Superior Court Judge Philip Mizzone, Jr. presided, the jury deliberated two and a half hours before awarding twice the $1.3 million offered by NJ Transit for the property three years ago.  The appraiser for the property owners, DJ Properties, estimated the property’s value at $2.9 million.  For more on this story, please click here for Nick Clunn’s article on NorthJersey.com.

The property owners in this matter were represented by McKirdy & Riskin’s John H. Buonocore, Jr., who was recently named as “Newark Area Best Lawyers Eminent Domain and Condemnation Lawyer of the Year” for 2012 by “Best Lawyers”.  For more on Mr. Buonocore’s designation by Best Lawyers, click here for an article on the Morris News Bee.

Photo courtesy of http://www.law.wm.edu

Edward McKirdy and Harry Riskin, McKirdy & Riskin‘s founding partners, recently attended the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference in Beijing, China.  The annual conference, which focuses on the interplay of civil rights and property rights, brought legal scholars, jurists, and practitioners from the United States and China together at Tsinghua University in Beijing to discuss and debate the global evolution of property rights.  During the conference retired United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was awarded the 2011 Brigham-Kanner Prize.  In her acceptance remarks, Justice O’Connor discussed the United States’ history of property rights protections, China’s emerging laws, and her own property rights decisions.

For more on this story, please see the following blog posts and new articles:

First International Property Rights Conference Completed in Beijing – William & Mary Law School

Beijing Conference Explores the Importance of Property Rights on a Global Scale – William & Mary Law School

Owners’ Counsel of America Participates in International Property Rights Conference in Beijing – Owners’ Counsel of America Blog

Summary of Brigham-Kanner Property Law Conferencehttp://www.inversecondemnation.com

The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Cory K. Kestner, Esq., of McKirdy & Riskin, PA, in the preparation of this article

English: The U.S. Grant Hotel, as viewed from ...

Image via Wikipedia

McKirdy & Riskin’s Harry Riskin and Anthony Della Pelle will be participating as faculty in the American Law InstituteAmerican Bar Association‘s 29th Annual “Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation” conference, to be held January 26th to January 28th, 2012 at the U.S. Grant Hotel in San Diego.  Harry will be speaking on the topic:  ”Not Now, But Soon:  Making a Reasonable Probability Case for Rezoning, Assemblage, Lease Renewals, and Other Value Enhancements”.  Tony’s session, “Strategic Motion Practice:  A Foundation for Winning Your Trial” , will be presented in the Condemnation 101 program at the conference.  Each conference offers 16 or more hours of CLE credit and features faculty members and attendees from around the nation, including attorneys, appraisers, right of way professionals and others who will share valuable experiences and engage in discussion on cutting-edge issues in the field.  For more information, click here.

 

Photo courtesy of CNN.com

The controversy surrounding the Keystone Pipeline project has escalated to the point where protesters surrounded the White House yesterday to demand that the project be stopped.

Read CNN’s coverage of the recent event here.

We previously covered this story in our New Jersey Condemnation Law Blog (story available here), and first discussed this project a year ago on Fox News Channel, where McKirdy & Riskin’s Anthony Della Pelle provided commentary – watch the video here

Fox News video coverage of Keystone Pipeline

The recent protests have politicized this project to the point where some have suggested that it will be a relevant topic in upcoming elections, pitting property rights advocates with environmental conservation forces against energy lobby and interests and those who contend that the project will help support the economy by providing thousands of high paying construction jobs.

This one does not seem destined to end any time in the near future, so we expect to be back for more soon.

City Converts Redevelopment Area to Rehabilitation Area, Saving Homes from Takings

photo courtesy of the Jersey Journal

Due to pressure from the voting public, the Jersey City governing body last week removed the threat of eminent domain in McGinley Square by converting the area from a “redevelopment area” to a “rehabilitation area.”  The latter provides for many of the same planning benefits afforded a redevelopment area, but removes government’s ability to take property from private property owners using the condemnation process.  Apparently, the people’s voices were heard, and the government listened.

The Jersey Journal covered the story here.

Hyperlinks to prior blogs and articles:

Et Tu Brutus?

About Face!

Hudson Reporter

Four of McKirdy & Riskin’s nine attorneys were selected as “Top 100″ Attorneys in New Jersey” for 2011 by Super Lawyers, as published by Thomson Reuters and in the April, 2011 edition of New Jersey Monthly Magazine.   Edward McKirdy (selected to the Top 100 list for the fourth straight year) and Anthony Della Pelle (selected to the Top 100 list for the third straight year) are returning members, while Harry Riskin and John Buonocore were named to the Top 100 Super Lawyers list for the first time.  

Super Lawyers selections are based upon peer recognition and professional achievement, and the “Top 100″ list includes the 100 New Jersey attorneys who received the highest point totals in the 2001 New Jersey Super Lawyers nomination, research and blue ribbon review process.  

McKirdy & Riskin’s Thomas Olson and Jeffrey Lewis were also named 2011 New Jersey Super Lawyers in the Eminent Domain Practice Area, and Cory Kestner was named as a 2011 Rising Star in the Eminent Domain Practice Area.   Congratulations to all!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 261 other followers